Friday, 15 August 2008

Lemon Tree

Heyla Dai - I don't know why you couldn't sign in. I checked before and your name and email address were still there. I'll have another look. I painted this while away - it's the next one in the Change series. Unfortunately it's painted in watercolour on poor quality canvas (was all I could find in the local shop) but I'll varnish it when I get the chance - that should help, shouldn't it?

I know you're busy with more important things and won't be able to reply to this yet, just wanted to post it.
......................................................................................................................................................
Heyla Ange - Yes - the whole colourfeel is cohesive here. For me, in terms of the kind of space dislocations, and an unworried colouring it works well in its humming lil mysteries( You still don't quite grasp how 'good' you are at this dislocation 'effect' - it has power - and helps to place and sustain that inherent poesis that you recognise, and want to instill in yr work - This provides that - ie. in this, it wills the looker to go beyond the ordinary 'place' because you show and demonstrate through it that you not only own the space - but are willing to give it back without dismaying the looker or letting them down((which you are getting))) This sort of 'unworried' or unfinicky colouring forms a partnership - for me - with paintings like LION and GREEN APPLES - they both have the same kind of space and form dislocations too. ( therefore their lil mysteries) ... Relook at some Blake if you can - but he's too strong in the stylistic sense in a way - so try looking at some Samuel Palmer - much better than looking at someone like Graham Sutherland frinstance who can lead you down the wrong track - better the Palmers and make yr own way forward from there rather than follow Sutherlands Picassoisms....but as y know, many of P's solutions to animals and many other forms are too good to miss out on.
Water colour on Canvas .hmmmmmmm... that's difficult - Best thing would be to lightly tack the canvas to heavy card and - with that spray fix stuff, treat it gently and get it under glass - the UV light will attack it even through a varnish I think.... but the canvas needs to be stabalised as above because it will be prone to movement and sagging in temperature changes etc - which will eventually pull apart the paint surface.
Dai

Sunday, 22 June 2008

Heart

Heyla, Dai. I've just been looking at your two new Escarpment paintings - oh what glorious colours. And then I look at 'Heart' that I painted before I went to Germany but needed to live with for a while before I put it up. It's dark, it's dark - so I didn't like it at first but I do now because it's right as it is, it has to be dark. I've put it on the Aja site. It's part of the Change series.

Mmmm ..... but now it's the cold light of day again, I like it as little as I did before. It's an ugly picture. Maybe I'll throw it in the bin and delete it. Will think about it just a bit longer.

Another day later - I still don't like it, it's so ugly. But it's painful and pain is ugly. Anyhow, can't bin it yet because it's in Leeds and I'm not.

Sunday, 27 April 2008

Stairway

And now for something different. I started this a few months ago and then left it until yesterday. It's been an exploration (sort of in conjunction with drawing practice) of perspective and directions - up and down, in and out etc. It's painted in acrylic on water colour board 50 x 40. It's got lots of imperfections but I like it.

Monday, 14 April 2008

Red Woman

After I'd finished her (and I never meant to paint her in the first place) she didn't seem to belong with the Hidden Women so I've put her with the Red Men in the Red Series. I don't know whether I'll like her next week or next month, but at the moment she's quite satisfying to look at.

I've finished (for the time being) reorganising the aja site so I can get on with my new projects. I'm trying not to spend any more time with Gledhow Valley Woods - it's turned to the wall - maybe the only way to be free of it is to burn it. Hmmm we'll see. I also need to redo the background on the old Ituski picture - that will fit well with Age and Visibility (after pondering I changed the Invisibility to Visibility because that's what I'm painting and hopefully celebrating - visibility of the old as well as the young).

Thinking of Itsuki, I finally put the panels together of his picture that Zoltan recently brought back from Hungary. I've sent the photo to Itsuki for his approval and then I'll post it on the site. I'm looking forward to that - it's such a pleasure to see it again.

That's it for now. How are you getting on with The Other Field - are they finished? And did you go hothouse drawing today?

Friday, 11 April 2008

Gina1 ballpoint sketch

This is the sketch I told you about that I did with Tescos ballpoint and gel pens. It was interesting to draw without being able to rub anything out. (I like rubbing out so much, I have been known to draw with the rubber as well as with the pencil so this felt like a strange exercise.) It was drawn from memory not a photograph.

This is the beginning of one the three projects I'm now engaged with - The 5 Sisters. I've been given lots of photocopies of pictures of the sisters that I want to draw and paint. I shall use these together with memories and real life visits as a base for what I do.

Monday, 24 March 2008

falling apples


Saw some of the drawings I hadn't seen before on yr site - but also saw this one - which is very good - and full of expectations.

I can see the trouble you've been having with it and the overpainting - but if can step back from it a little - it has a bit of magic on the quiet - again the intersting dislocations of the green world - and importantly the 'isolated figure' sitting with back toward the viewer....in a space of its own almost. I like it a lot - it looks less 'tryhard' than some others, and all the better for it - titles good too. cheers. Dai
PS - Untitled 300 from yr website also looks interesting

Friday, 29 February 2008

Under Rubbles 294 by Itsuki Matayoshi


Itsuki said this was a series, too, but I didn't see these. He did some other versions of this one in photoshop, and I put one on the ajagap site.
I know that you paint differently from Itsuki, but there is something in both your works that I absolutely love and get lost in. This one reminds me of your work even though it's so different.

Weaker Vessels by Itsuki Matayoshi

This one was done in 2001 but he did a whole series of these. I remember him doing some before he left Oxford at the beginning of 2000.

'Sanctity' by Itsuki Matayoshi

Heyla, Dai - I'm thrilled to be getting pictures from Itsuki again, so wanted to share them with you. I've put them on the ajagap site but pictures are better on here because you can click to make them bigger. I must sort out the other site so you can do that there, too, but no time yet.

Will post a few more as separate posts.

Saturday, 19 January 2008

Hand and Eye

pastel and gouache on card, 26 x 24 cms

Hello Dai - I've changed my mind - I like this now.

I didn't like it before because I wanted to repaint the hand and tidy up the lines etc - but it's not possible. It is as it is and can't be changed or the balance would be spoilt.

I put it on the wall so I'm living with it to see if I still like it in a few weeks time. At the moment, I do.

In my big picture sort out, I'm throwing some away and rediscovering others. I'll be glad though when I've finished.

Friday, 18 January 2008

Metamorphosis 2 (2000) & 1 (1996)




I'm still sorting out pictures, framing and mounting. That makes it sound easy but actually I've got paintstripper all over my left hand - despite wearing plastic bags - and it's going very very slowly.
Metamorphosis 2 is gouache and acrylic on black card. The mixed media means that some parts are shinier than others - this looks fine on the original but I've not been able to take a photograph that shows the colours anywhere near accurately. This is the best I could manage.

Friday, 11 January 2008

Female Torso - an old picture

Hello Dai - this is an old picture from 1997 - A4, pastel and oil pastel on paper. I had this up for quite a while but then took it down to put something else up and forgot about it. This one always reminds me of Barbara Dixon, one of my old next door neighbours in Oxford, also an artist (she's a wood carver)- she always liked this one. I'm still unpacking pictures - I seem to have quite a few (had to start work straight away after moving plus Paul's 50th and Jay's visit etc in between so unpacking has been slow). Was pleased to find the picture that goes with the Metamorphosis drawing, too - will post it soon and others.

Yesterday the sun shone and I went out and took lots of photographs of trees, houses and oranges 10 for £1! There are some really good things about living round here but the streets are often full of litter and last week the bus windows were so dirty I couldn't see through them. I hope you're having a good rest after your exhibition and all the Christmas work. I'm not in a hurry for a reply. Bye for now. Angie X

Monday, 7 January 2008

Drawing bits - revamped and examples

Look at how Picasso plays with shape, tone and line here - he is CREATING -having fun - finding the fundimentals of the form - the ones that speak -the ones that tell the story.

This is red chalk - or terracotta pencil on a cream paper ( hard to know about the paper) by Boucher - notice how 'open' it is for all it's 'realism' it has economy and intelligence of line that come about through observation and practice. Things have to simply have the right dimensions here, the right shape, and no fussyness of tone, just clarity in the areas - mostly simple crosshatching and lines running the same way as the forms to block in the main areas . NB the different line weights - crucial stuff.


This is a Picasso head - notice how there is no line around the hair, its a few open marks that suggest motion and direction. The eyes, nose, lips, ears are clean and clear, everything else, like the tie and the hair has a different kind of mark. notice how spaces are left like where the left lower cheek doesn't meet up with anything - things like this lets light work subliminally - same for the hair.
Here's Escher, using all the instruments he can muster, rullers, dividers, elipse guides, etc etc -There are somethings that you need instruments for - if you want to draw a straight line - use a ruler. And for all the mix up of dimensional space - in each dimension the constancy of light in producing consistent highlights and shadows rule.

I'VE ADDED TO WHAT I WROTE IN THE EMAIL - just general thoughts.

Shadows, surface, texture - it's all the constancy of light Ange.
Light reveals all: When there's too much of it, it flares and obliterates shape and detail just like darkness. The 'object' exists within this tension of light and dark. (I only just thought of that last sentence as an explanation - of sorts - and I like it!) The object of the drawing lessons you're putting y’rself through, although about aspects of observation; it's the hand eye co-ordination it helps to build that you really need.
In the end, it’s an easy and loose control of materials while you do the thinking unthinking thing. The thinking unthinking is also control and accident. Control is also about using a ruler to draw a straight line if the object requires it, it’s common sense - or at least draw feint ones as guidelines, the same for circles and elipses – I used to use a lot of plastic elipses and circle templates when I was illustrating. This is all about making things look ‘real’ – if you’re drawing a glass bottle f’rinstance, the lines must be straight and the ellipses must be at the correct observed angle – then the eye says wow, that looks real. It takes all that kind of stuff – the shortcut tricks to get the object to look as if it is ‘real’. A drawing of a wonky bottle is a drawing of a wonky bottle – do you see what I mean?
It's a lot like the basics of music - playing a bit of piano or guitar - if you practice three chords - say G, C, D. and listen to how they interact, their particular intervals of tones - and practice moving between them with different rhythms and learn two of the relative minors that go with them - Aminor, Bminor - all Western Music harmony is there in their relationships. ( Like observing an object to see where the light is coming from and where the strong lines and shadows are – the chord also has ground rules – it has to be in tune.)
Nearly every song you've ever heard is built on the way these couple of minors and majors interact - and certainly all (western) choral and pop music. It's the three chord trick of Jazz and blues – it’s three part harmony.Think of three tones of grey pencil, which is all you need to render - a light, a mid, a dark. These combine to make the actual substance of the 'object' you're drawing. When they are right – like your dark ball – they become ‘it’ the thing – rather than the scribbly nearly versions. They look like this because of the hesitancy of trying to get it right – trying to get the tone variations to fade into each other etc. they simply look like scribbled marks on the paper. The thing itself is in the balances of tone as light or darkness reveals its shape/ bulk- the highlights reveal texture and the shadows, or darker planes of the object help reveal the bulk or density of the form. Glass is the same - it's simply more complicated because light is reflecting everywichway, combined with its transparency – it needs a lot of quiet observation – just looking to see what is happening – but it pays off. You can read all this stuff – and anything else you find in a book – but it isn’t understood until you go thru the drawing exercises over and over again. Concentrate on one effect at a time – say, like how to I make something shiny? You’ll see examples in your books – usually that effect is about a degree of contrast of light and dark – because hard materials reflect hard and clean edges. You just have to chase it until you get it right – you know if you get it right –because it looks right.
To render well and to a high standard of realism you need yr hand and eye and your control of materials working together to make marks that mimic the constancy of light - that's what all the various techniques like crosshatching, drawing small circles, continuous shading are about - qualities of consistency – use rulers, French curves, anything to help achieve this.Light travels outward meeting the edge of an object, and onward until it meets another plane - If you draw a cube - or a circle and mark a dot as a light source anywhere above it, draw a line where the light source hits any cube edge and carry it on to the 'ground' - that's the length of the shadow - because light moves in straight lines -( unless its bent by a missive star or black hole of course - lol) and it's always - always reflecting - and carrying with it colour information from one surface to another ( local colour) - in drawing, this is tone, and density of tone. Outside, the sky reflects in just about everything (an aspect of local color ) Keep on doing the drawing exercises, any drawing exercises, you'll get better. Remember tho - that the kind of highly rendered drawing - say that A,C. on the painters site is doing is the constancy/consistency thing ( She's good) - it's a different mindset, and only time and careful application – lots of it – allows that kind of illustrative artist to work realism or a reasonable facsimile of it in time enough to earn money. It’s no good being ace if it takes you so long to do it that the client can’t afford you. You learn lots of tricks and any shortcuts you can.
For many - or probably most people, camera realism is the main signifier of 'skill' and that's fine, it holds much of the perceived worth of the history of art - it's a different kind of needful thing – it’s about getting the work finished so it looks ‘correct’ and nobody is able to say otherwise.
What are you going to do when you are trying to draw highly emotive things, personal things, things where there are no ‘objects’ no things in reality to compare them to. Some can do it, most can’t, many won’t or will give it up because they can’t stand the fact that other people won’t ‘understand’ it thinking that they ‘can’t draw’.
If you have something to prove – it can be a long road waiting until someone or everyone, finally agrees, ‘Gosh that looks just like a Photograph’ !!! Duh! lol.
Don’t see the point myself – you may as well take a photograph.
Best not to have anything to prove – what y’do is what y’do – just keep practicing slowly and everything will improve a few months down the line.
Rendering so that there is some kind of strong 'realism' is completely about a constancy and consistency of mark and feel - and like a lot of other good illustrative drawers, and coloured pencil workers on that site - they spend a lot of careful time practicing – and looking - because that is the only route to it ( unless your a natural drawing savant.)So keep practicing, you say you would like to render – draw – ‘better’ simply keep on practicing and seeing how you can make tone work, like you found with the ball – the darker version is a more complete ‘thing’ it sits on the paper, becomes more than the paper - and the eye says yea that’s right.
Keep doing the other H.W. drawings along side your observations and exercises and you can have a bit of both worlds – which is what I think you’d like.
Three tones of pencil. Light Mid Dark. From the H's to the 5B's - each a tonal world that can interact with each other - use the ones that satisfy. The same with your coloured pencils. Three tones of yellow, red blue, orange violet etc.
This lil rule of three tones might help you.
By using such rules what we are doing is finding ways of cutting down on the chaos - of controlling it, of centering in on its essentials - of recognizing basic visual things like the constancy of light - and dark is the absence of light - shadows come under that rule too – shadows are graduations toward light – or graduations toward darkness – the brighter the light the darker and clearer the shadow – but shadows have their parts too – the umbra and penumbra, the umbra being the full shadow and the penumbra being a softer shadow around it.. You can find stuff about this on the web.
Make your own rules too if you want to, as another exercise or keep a small paper folder of A5 drawings that are all about one kind of rule (write it on the folder front) and another folder about another kind of rule.
Rules could be anything you choose:-
Eg. ‘All lines, marks, will move and be made in the same direction as the light’ ‘Everytime I make a mark here, I will make a similar mark elsewhere on the paper’ These become are your own variations of reality – because you dare to
Reality impinges itself upon our consciousness willy nilly – there are aspects of it you can change in art if y want and see how it looks – just because you can.
Painting outside or anywhere, you can make some of your own rules - and impose them on 'reality' as it imposes itself upon you - we did it all the time painting in the black mountains - we'd go out one day and say - 'ok –today - wherever we paint the sky - it will never be at the top of the painting.
‘All shadows will be light instead of dark’
It’s ‘stuff’ to do – to try - about whatever one perceives the nature of reality to be – it plays around with us – so that means we can play around with it. You need to be grounded and aware of what you’re doing with this kind of stuff – because you need to remember that you’re playing.

Wednesday, 2 January 2008

Shadows not right




These exercises are to practise shading and perspective. I'm getting better at getting the perspective right (although a long way to go to perfect), but I can't get the shadows right.
2 globes (shading exercise)
The 2 globes were copied from the book but the shadows don't look right. Maybe this is because in the copying I've changed the places where the light hits. The one on the right looks laughable - I can get it better than that, but found the shading surprisingly difficult to make convincing. The one on the left is pleasurable because it looks nice and heavy and I can imagine picking it up - not sure about its shadow though. It's hard to check the shadows without having the real objects to hand and then I can get the shapes right but not the lines of the shading within the shadow.
bottle and little vase (simple objects exercise)
These were drawn from life. I think the perspective is not too bad (I drew them separately as 2 separate exercises - they were not standing together, they just happen to be next to each other on the page) but the shadows, although correct in shape, are not correct in shading - they look crude.
stool
This was drawn from life and the stool worked out not too badly, but once again I had trouble with shading the shadows. The shadow underneath the stool is not bad because it was very dark. The shadows from the open door - one to the stool, the other thrown back against the skirting board were easy to draw the shapes for but then I failed to shade them properly. I find I often draw directions into the shadows that turn out not to be right. Any advice, Dai?
By the way - I love shadows ........